This is a letter/article sent to me from Larry Glenn, former fire marshal
of Port Angeles, WA and retired Deputy State Fire Marshal. Sharing it for
your consideration.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Larry Glenn <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 8:02 PM
Subject: Fwd: Fire Sprinkler Article Request
To: [email protected]


Ron,
Since I am no longer a member of the fraternity, I am having trouble
getting people to print this.  The State Chiefs have agreed to run it.
Anybody you can think of that might be willing to stir the pot, feel free.
Larry Glenn








INSTANT FIREFIGTERS

ARE
                                                                     AFFORDABLE
LIFESAVERS


In 1960, when I began my career in the fire service, interior attacks on
house fires were often able to be made without self contained breathing
apparatus, (SCBA)   Granted, in those days SCBAs weren't readily available
or used by many departments and there were many who saw it as a sign of
weakness to even bother with them.

Then in the late 60's and early 70's  the nature of house fires in general
changed dramatically.
With the introduction of polyurethane foam, (often described as compressed
gasoline), as a replacement for Jute furniture padding, one of the most
feared phenomena for all firefighters swiftly became an almost regular
occurance.  Flashover.

It starts small enough, as with most fires, with the ignition by a small
flame on or near any foam padded furniture inside any home.  The initial
piece of furniture on fire produces a thick layer of hot gases which
spreads rapidly across the ceiling, heating the surfaces of all the
combustible material within the room.  This causes them to give off
flammable gases.  Once those gases reach their ignition point, they ignite
almost instantaneously throughout the entire area.  Flashover in home fires
can and does occur often within just four minutes.  In many cases flashover
has already occurred with the responding fire engines barely even out of
the station.

Sadly, this means that in many cases if the occupants aren't out of the
home before flashover occurs there is a good chance they aren't going to
get out.

In answer to this dramatic change in fire progression, a number of
progressive fire departments in California, Arizona, and Washington began
promoting the installation of home fire sprinklers, often called "Instant
Firefighters", within their jurisdictions through local ordinances and
prevention enforcement.
Several agencies even built live fire residential fire protection sprinkler
demonstration trailers which showed the speed and effectiveness of home
fire sprinklers in extinguishing room fires within seconds, let alone the
minutes required to reach the point of flashover.

As a result of these programs, a number of cities and counties adopted home
fire sprinkler requirements for new homes.

Most of these programs were vehemently opposed by segments of the building
industry.  Their argument was that the fire problem was mainly in older
homes and the added cost would eliminate many new and first time buyers.
They made this same arguement against fire alarms but now also claim
today's home is built much safer from fire.  This is actually a true and
fair point to make as sheet rock rarely burns.

However, most of us don't sit or sleep on sheet rock.  We sit and sleep on
foam padded furnishings, with substantially lower flashover points.  I
firmly believe that houses burning aren't what is killing people and
destroying property, it is the polyurethane foam padded furnishing burning
in those homes that is killing people and destroying property.

The building industry is once again attacking home fire sprinkler
requirements.  Regrettably, in some areas of the country, they are even
having successes in weakening or removing these requirements based on this
same arguement about construction materials.  Despite the fact an
unfurnished home DOES NOT stay unfurnished for long.

So why, then, is the building industry finally having success after all
these years?

I believe the blame may fall equally on three entities.  The fire service,
the fire sprinkler industry and the fire sprinkler manufacturers.

First, the Fire Service - does the fire service practice what it preaches?
Ask your local fire department how many of their firefighters have fire
sprinklers in their homes.  I remember in the early 60s we were also among
the last to install the then smoke detectors in our homes, as well.

Second,  The Fire Sprinkler Industry -  Frankly the fire sprinkler industry
has sat on their successes for several decades and simply not continued
researching and developing their products.  Years ago we successfully
tested sprinkler heads that had a micro-switch connected by low voltage
wiring to a regular lawn sprinkler solenoid.  This micro-switch was taken
from an Identifier model head manufactured by Central Sprinkler
Corporation, who also witnessed these tests, normally used in correctional
facilities to identify the cell location of a sprinkler activation.  The
micro-switch was held in an off position by the ceiling plate.  When the
temperature got to 135 degrees, the plate dropped off activating the
solenoid allowing the water into the piping.  When the temperature got to
165 degrees, the head opened and water flowed.  The solenoid was set to
shut off the water at 10 minutes.  We realized the components used would
have to be "listed" but these successful tests answered several concerns
used even today against residential sprinklers such as accidental
activation, frozen water pipes in exposed areas, and how to shut off the
water after activation.  This type of system would also reduce the cost
of the retrofitting of existing homes.  These tests were held over 25 years
ago and to my knowledge nothing further has been tested or developed on
this concept - or anything even remotely like it  - since.

For those in the field, this is a pre action design and these tests were
meant to adapt that commercial protection system to a residential
application.  A means of protecting consumer products and storage which as
been available and successfully used for decades has still not been adapted
to protecting our most vulnerable citizens where they live and sleep.

Third, The Fire Sprinkler Manufacturing Industry - Those who build and
distribute these devices simply refuse to sell the sprinkler heads and the
approved piping to anybody other than fire sprinkler contractors.  There is
no law, rule, or code preventing the public at large from buying and using
these products for any reason.  Every trade has some regulation except when
done by the homeowner, but Fire Protection Sprinklers is the one trade the
average person cannot even buy the parts for.  You are allowed to buy and
install lawn sprinklers that save your grass, but not fire sprinklers that
save your - posterior.  How does that make any sense?

Imagine if the big box stores were allowed to purchase these products and
conduct "How To" seminars on the design and installation of home fire
sprinklers.  Like they already do for, say, home wiring, tract lighting,
and lawn sprinklers?

Finally, I believe if fire sprinklers in homes are to be accepted by home
builders it may require the installation be done mostly by licensed
plumbers.  Vancouver B.C. proved this to be true years ago.

The City of Dupont in the state of Washington is a more recent example
which also proves this to be a fact.  They require all new homes to be
sprinklered and even "prefer", for lack of better phrasing, combination
plumbing and fire sprinkler systems be installed.  These installing
contractors are licensed both as Fire Protection Sprinkler System
Contractors and as Licensed Plumbers thereby proving competency to all
applicable trades, codes, and industry requirements from both trades.

Since the plumber will already be on the job for the potable or drinking
water system for EVERY new home this brings the cost down substantially.
Let's be honest here, home fire sprinklers are nothing more than heat
activated faucets strategically placed in the ceiling or walls of a home.
A faucet we hope never goes off at that.

In today's climate of budget constraints, staffing concerns, and response
logistics the fire service finds it is becoming more difficult to arrive in
time to save lives and property from these home fires.  Their attack
changes from offensive to defensive.

In most cases, a single residential head not only holds the fire to the
room of origin, but often actually puts the fire out entirely saving the
costs on repairs and preventing the risk of flashover entirely.  The fire
service must finally accept the reality that the future of residential fire
safety must rely on  Instant Firefighters.  *Th**e** Affordable Life Saver.*






-- 
Ron Greenman

[email protected]

253.576.9700 <(253)%20576-9700>

The Universe is monstrously indifferent to the presence of man. -Werner
Herzog, screenwriter, film director, author, actor and opera
director (1942-)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to