I suspect it would require an RPZ ahead of it if installed off fire protection 
water in these parts. Around here no chemical can be added to a fire protection 
water source without triggering an RPZ. That probably applies to connecting to 
a plumbing supply. On this unit you have both hot water and cold water 
connections. The hot is for the wash down. Internally the hot and cold manifold 
together. The cold valve is supervised. The hot valve is not. Its not quite 
clear if the wash down goes to the suppression nozzles or not. Its hard to 
believe the wash down is also applied into the kitchen appliances as shown in 
some of the piping setups in addition to washing down the grease filters. 

Allan Seidel
St. Louis, MO


> On Apr 20, 2017, at 2:17 PM, Mark Phillips <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> We have run into that before in large hotels etc.
> Its for FIRE protection so people assume that sprinkler contractor will be 
> tying into it.
> We always push back and have the plumbing contractor supply to it.
>  
> Do so by  saying if it connects to the fire sprinkler system there needs to 
> be a valve and that valves needs to be monitored and then it snowballs into  
> its just easier for plumbing to add it as if was a ice machine etc. 
>  
> IMHO
>  
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Eric V. 
> Tysinger
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 3:05 PM
> To: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Hood System - Question
>  
> Yes that is it, first time ever seeing it and my initial thought was it’s not 
> part of the sprinkler system and I couldn’t find any guidance in NFPA 13 
> about non-system connections that discharge water. Section 7.7 addresses 
> connections for heating and cooling but clearly state there can be no water 
> discharge from those auxiliary systems.
>  
>  
>  
> 
> Eric V. Tysinger 
> Designer 
> Wiginton Fire Systems - Miami, FL
> Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Main: 305-888-2402
> Direct: 305-830-0490
> Fax: 305-888-3804 
> Mobile: 239-633-9703
> 
>  
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Confidentiality Notice: 
> This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the 
> intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. 
> Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If 
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail 
> and destroy all copies of the original message.
> 
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Prahl, 
> Craig/GVL
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 2:50 PM
> To: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Hood System - Question
>  
> Is what you’re referring to the Captive Aire’s CORE fire suppression system? 
> https://www.captiveaire.com/catalogcontent/firesuppression/core/index.asp 
> <https://www.captiveaire.com/catalogcontent/firesuppression/core/index.asp>
>  
>  
> Interesting system for cleaning and suppression.  It uses water combined with 
> a surfactant to make it work. 
>  
> Apparently it is ETL listed to UL 300 standards and meets criteria of NFPA 
> 17A (wet chemical extinguishing systems) and NFPA 96.
>  
> Looks like it can be tied into plumbing systems or building sprinkler system. 
>  So what NFPA language would prevent this from being connected to the 
> sprinkler system?
>  
>  
> 
> Craig L. Prahl 
> Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
> CH2M
> 200 Verdae Blvd. 
> Greenville, SC  29607
> Direct - 864.920.7540
> Fax - 864.920.7129
> CH2MHILL Extension  77540
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
>  
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Eric V. 
> Tysinger
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 2:33 PM
> To: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Hood System - Question [EXTERNAL]
>  
> I don’t have the exact model yet but the manufacturer is Captive Aire. I 
> meant approved/listed in the sense “as a hood system” not as a part of a fire 
> sprinkler system.
>  
>  
>  
> 
> Eric V. Tysinger 
> Designer 
> Wiginton Fire Systems - Miami, FL
> Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Main: 305-888-2402
> Direct: 305-830-0490
> Fax: 305-888-3804 
> Mobile: 239-633-9703
> 
>  
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Confidentiality Notice: 
> This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the 
> intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. 
> Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If 
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail 
> and destroy all copies of the original message.
> 
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Prahl, 
> Craig/GVL
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 2:28 PM
> To: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Hood System - Question
>  
> You say it’s “approved and listed”.  If that is the case, why would it not be 
> allowed?
>  
> Do you have a link to this unit?
>  
> 
> Craig L. Prahl 
> Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
> CH2M
> 200 Verdae Blvd. 
> Greenville, SC  29607
> Direct - 864.920.7540
> Fax - 864.920.7129
> CH2MHILL Extension  77540
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
>  
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Eric V. 
> Tysinger
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 2:06 PM
> To: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Hood System - Question [EXTERNAL]
>  
> Good afternoon all,
>  
> Apparently, there is a standalone approved/listed type of hood suppression 
> system for kitchens that uses water as the extinguishing agent. Within their 
> data sheet it states that it requires a supervised water source “or” that it 
> may be tied into the fire sprinkler system. It has a minimum required 
> starting water pressure of 30psi and “IF” it is supplied/tied into the 
> sprinkler system then it would most definitely have to be accounted for in 
> the hydraulics. But, it is obviously not a part of the fire sprinkler system 
> or NFPA 13. My first thought is that regardless of their data sheet, it 
> shouldn’t be allowed per NFPA 13. Am I thinking correctly? Wouldn’t it be 
> considered a non-system component and not allowed?
>  
>  
> <image001.jpg>
>  
>  
> 
> Eric V. Tysinger 
> Designer 
> Wiginton Fire Systems - Miami, FL
> Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Main: 305-888-2402
> Direct: 305-830-0490
> Fax: 305-888-3804 
> Mobile: 239-633-9703
> 
>  
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Confidentiality Notice: 
> This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the 
> intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. 
> Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If 
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail 
> and destroy all copies of the original message.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org 
> <http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to