Are there states that have dealt with the water system development fee issue? This is still a common barrier.
Best Bruce Verhei > On Apr 19, 2017, at 14:29, å... .... <[email protected]> wrote: > > > One of my takes on this residential focus of fire protection is yet again > another win (thus far) for profit over good judgment. > > In this case of residential application, safety of the user is competing > against profit of the current sprinkler design/install industry. > Clearly there is cost savings and safety winnings for the residential user > with the plumber proposal. > > I understand the residential sprinkler industry wants to maintain > design-install quality. But then, we should also want to maintain quality > ITM quality for the residential community. Only in this, there is very > little money, at least until someone figures out a way to codify the ITM. But > such a prescription would tip our hand to the home builders' lobby . > > This idea is moneyball for almost-all homeowners, but it does not play well > with the monetized profit sought by the current residential sprinkler design > and install industry. > > The collateral cost of profit has bought a lot of the unwanted things that we > got. > > Scot Deal > Excelsior Fire & Risk Engineering > gms: +420 608 318 498 > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
