I believe it came with the transition from FM 2-8N to FM 2-0 in 2011.
Damien Shannon. From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rocci Cetani 3 Sent: 01 June 2017 08:37 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Review Comments Wow this is news to me, we have never been held to this on an FM project…..it’s been 2 or 3 years since I have done one, is it a new requirement? Rocci Cetani III, CET Designer Water-Based Fire Protections Systems Layout, Nicet Level III Northern California Fire Protection Services Inc. 16840 Joleen Way Bldg. A Morgan Hill, CA 93037 P-(408) 776-1580 EXT.111 F-(408) 776-1590 [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.norcalfire.com <http://www.norcalfire.com/> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message and any document accompanying it may contain confidential information belonging to the sender. The information is intended only for the use of individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by telephone to arrange for return of the documents. From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Travis Mack Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 6:59 AM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: Review Comments Yes. That comes straight from FM. If you have an FM job, you will be held to that requirement. Travis Mack, SET MFP Design, LLC "Follow" us on Facebook: <https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692> https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692 Send large files to MFP Design via: https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign Sent from my iPhone On Jun 1, 2017, at 6:31 AM, Damien Shannon <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: That is a requirement in FM Datasheet 2-0. Is it an FM project? Was it specified in project specs? Can you use seamless pipe to bypass the issue? Damien Shannon. From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Harris Sent: 01 June 2017 06:59 To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Review Comments Just got back some review comments for a project we’re doing and one in particular stuck out; “Orient longitudinal pipe weld seam toward building roof; at least 45 degrees in relationship to the floor (for reference, the weld line points to the floor at 0 degrees) to mitigate pipe weld seam corrosion.” Could you imagine the headache that would cause at the fab shop? Brian Harris, CET BVS Systems Inc. Design Manager bvssystemsinc.com <http://bvssystemsinc.com/> Phone: 704.896.9989 Fax: 704.896.1935 _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
