I looked at the 2016 edition to see if the language was changed, it was not.
This is usually my first move.  If you ever want a committee's
interpretation of the standard, look at the next edition.  If they
encountered an interpretation error or misunderstanding, that is where they
fix it.  My second move is to go back to basics, put the water on the fire.
In my opinion they were going for something like this.  

 

Additional sprinklers are not required below obstructions centered between
sprinklers, in accordance with Figure 8.11.5.3.4, where the obstructions are
limited to a maximum width of 24" and it does not extend more than 12" past
the midpoint between sprinklers.  

 

There has been a move to remove negative language from the standard.  The
idea is to state where additional sprinklers are required instead of where
they are not required.  I think the language in this case just got a little
awkward.  

 

My humble opinion only.

 


Nick Maneen, SET 

c 704.791.7789

 

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of James Crawford
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2017 7:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Obstructions with CMSA

 

Looking for some input as some of the wording does not make sense.

 

NFPA #13 (2013 ed)

CMSA

Section 8.11.5.3.4 Where the bottom of the obstruction is located 24in or
more below the sprinkler deflector, the following shall occur:

 

This would seem to infer that all the items listed must be met, but for item
2b and 3b you require a sprinkler head under the obstruction, so if you put
a head under the obstruction do you still need to meet Item 1 and center the
obstruction between heads. This does not make sense.

 

Opinions please as we have an AHJ that is asking for the obstruction to be
relocated and for the head under it.

 

Thank you

 

 

James Crawford

Phaser Fire Protection Ltd.

Phone  604-888-0318

Fax 604-888-4732

Cel 604-790-0938

Email  [email protected]

Web www.phaserfire.ca

 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to