I’ve had some large demand systems….5000 gpm and more.  They always had 
specified (3) 2500 gpm pumps for the 5000 gpm systems.  I had one 9000 gpm 
system that had (4) 3000 gpm pumps.  The idea was that if any one pump was 
done, the system would still be maintained with adequate pumping capability.

 

 

I had a pump rep try to explain it that the systems had requirements of a 
backup pump.  It was less expensive to provide (3) 2500 gpm pumps than (2) 5000 
gpm pumps.  And, you technically had a backup.  The idea is that it would be 
very very rare to have 2 pumps down simultaneously.

 

Thankfully, I’ve only been involved on the shop drawing side of these where 
others have already determined the pumping capacity and how it was to be 
delivered.

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Mark.Phelps
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 7:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Multiple Pumps

 

Other NFPA Standards address fire pump requirements such as 409 and 15 I 
believe as requiring the full satisfaction of the design demand being met with 
the largest (of multiple pumps) being out of service. I've not experienced such 
high flow demands as Q= 7500 outside these Standards. 

Mark at Aero 

602 820-7894

 

Sent from my iPhone


On Dec 19, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Cahill, Christopher <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

So I found this in NFPA 20 - 4.9.1 A centrifugal fire pump for fire protection 
shall be selected so that the greatest single demand for any fire protection 
system connected to the pump is less than or equal to 150 percent of the rated 
capacity (flow) of the pump.

 

So does that mean if the demand is 1,000 gpm I can’t use 3 - 250 gpm pumps?  
Don’t ask why someone would do that, yes it would be odd.  Think really big 
flows and high pressures where variable flow in reality one might choose to 
split the pumps.  

 

So basically isn’t it demanding a single pump for systems up to 7,500 gpm? 
(assuming a 5,000 gpm pump is the maximum) No option for using 2 - 3,000’s?

 

Chris Cahill, PE*

Associate Fire Protection Engineer 

Burns & McDonnell

Phone:  952.656.3652

Fax:  952.229.2923

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 <http://www.burnsmcd.com/> www.burnsmcd.com

*Registered in: MN

 

If Americans switched from pounds to kilograms there would be mass confusion. 

 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
http://secure-web.cisco.com/19AwbBeqFZF_Qn53w9ForKnuINbkAiy4_Q4UNbzQzVqJXb-RQmGlMrerjeZ56r_17EGJk_l2JUn4Ht5Je-G-8TrxjFJgJglAom2wxSjk5pPn4VD_8m4Qwuda3DTLpEWksjWvftiCCZqB1Hgv77GGInu8CRCVUUHAFboEShiQ4224xaYbfK_J-G6a0atr_V98O0urbIOYIOOqTzX_O4X-ZstYYiekNui26Xi9RoD0havaMmI3G0p1qRCowGeTp6Zvk/http%3A%2F%2Flists.firesprinkler.org%2Flistinfo.cgi%2Fsprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to