Or.., what if it's the panel on fire??

Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Droid
On Feb 2, 2018 12:05 PM, Michael Goodis <m...@keyfps.com> wrote:
I have to agree with Matt here.  If it is with-in 18” below the sprinklers it 
is considered an obstruction, if it is just under the piping, it does not allow 
for the water pattern to properly form to cover the room as the sprinklers are 
designed.

Regards,

Michael Goodis
Salesman, Project Manager
IL#000635   NICET#135586
Key Fire Protection Enterprises LLC
3200 Mike Padgett HWY
Augusta, GA 30906
Office- (706)790-3473
Cell- (706) 220-8822
Fax: (706) 738-2119



From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On 
Behalf Of Matthew J Willis
Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 1:40 PM
To: Forum <sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>; b...@firebyknight.com
Subject: Re: Shield for electrical equipment

I still sleeve pipe because I disagree with the shield allowance. To me it is 
an obstruction
For your case, I would defer that to electrical folks as we do not know their 
requirements per se.
R
Matt

Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Droid
On Feb 2, 2018 11:36 AM, Bob 
<b...@firebyknight.com<mailto:b...@firebyknight.com>> wrote:
Has anyone installed a hood/ shield for electrical equipment?  Can this be 
something as simple as a sheet metal pan that covers the width and depth?
Suggestions, pictures, or name calling would be appreciated.


Thank you,

Bob Knight, CET III
208-318-3057
[FBK-LOGO-SMALL]

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to