NFPA 13, 2013 ed, 184.108.40.206.2 says, “Concealed spaces of noncombustible and
limited-combustible construction with limited access and not permitting
occupancy or storage of combustibles shall not require sprinkler protection.”
Would a utility tunnel that is under the footprint of the building meet the
requirements of the above reference to omit sprinklers? Does limited access
mean locked doors?
I am looking at a building tunnel that is “accessible” via climbing a ladder
from a basement corridor…no door. Another tunnel is accessed from a mechanical
room but there is no door to get into the tunnel from the mechanical room, but
the mechanical room door is locked.
Trying to determine which tunnels would require sprinkler protection...or
really I am starting with the assumption that the tunnels are required to be
sprinklered but wondering if certain tunnels would meet requirements to omit
sprinklers. The AHJ actually floated the idea of installing sprinklers from
the sprinklered corridor 15’ into the tunnel, but he also said I have to find a
clear code/standard reference that allows the omission of sprinkler protection
in the tunnels otherwise we will need to protect them.
I’m not necessarily looking for opinions on whether we should or shouldn’t
protect the tunnels, but more so, what the intent of 8.15 is in regards to
tunnels or if there are other references in the IBC (2012) or elsewhere that
would shed more light.
Reed A. Roisum, SET | Karges-Faulconbridge, Inc. | Senior Fire Protection
Designer | Fargo, ND | direct: 701.552.9903 | mobile: 701.388.1352 |
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
Sprinklerforum mailing list