Can the ESFR's be left in place and just add in rack sprinklers as needed?

 

Art

 

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Kyle.Montgomery
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 7:15 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: Converting from ESFR to CMDA - Spacing Issues

 

I think you're right. It just doesn't seem like that should be the case. How
can this spacing allowance be appropriate for the notoriously unforgiving
ESFR criteria, but somehow not OK for the traditionally much more forgiving
standard spray sprinklers. Or that Factory Mutual, who you could say has
more "skin in the game" than NFPA, would allow it if it were a poor
practice. You know what I'm saying?

 

Do you guys think that this spacing arrangement is intentionally prohibited
by NFPA 13, or that it's more of a scenario that just isn't specifically
addressed? In other words, does anyone think that a sprinkler system with
standard spray heads spaced at 10, 10, 9, 11, 10, 10, 9, 11 (per ESFR
requirements) would actually be deficient as a result? I'm thinking about
taking this to the AHJ to see if they would allow it, but I don't want to
suggest doing it if there is good reason to believe that it is a "bad fire
protection practice".

 

I appreciate the input.

 

Kyle Montgomery

 cid:[email protected]

Aero Automatic Sprinkler Co.

21605 N. Central Ave.

Phoenix, AZ 85024

Direct: 623.580.7820

Cell: 602.763.4736

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 

 

 

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of MFP Design, LLC
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 2:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Converting from ESFR to CMDA - Spacing Issues

 

FM allows it because all of their sprinklers are "storage" sprinklers.  It
doesn't matter if it is CMDA, CMSA or ESFR, it is a "storage" sprinkler for
FM so the extended requirements are in play.  I don't think you will find
any forgiveness on this issue in 13.

 

Every time we've dealt with this in the past, we have had to respace
sprinklers along the branchline when that happens.

 

MFP_logo_F

Travis Mack, SET

MFP Design, LLC

3356 E Vallejo Ct

Gilbert, AZ 85298

480-505-9271

fax: 866-430-6107

 <mailto:email:[email protected]> email:[email protected]

 

http://www.mfpdesign.com

https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692

Send large files to us via: https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign 

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/travismack

 

"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low
price is forgotten."

 

From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On
Behalf Of Kyle.Montgomery
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 1:26 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Converting from ESFR to CMDA - Spacing Issues

 

We're looking at a project where a portion of an existing ESFR building is
being converted to store cartooned expanded plastics. It looks like we've
settled on a design criteria that involves changing out the sprinklers at
the deck to 11.2K standard spray sprinklers at a 0.45 density and adding 2
levels of in-rack sprinklers.

 

This issue I need to address is this: Existing ESFR sprinklers took
advantage of the spacing allowance to avoid being obstructed by structural
members. The lines are 10 ft on-center and the head spacing is 10, 10, 9,
11, 10, 10, 9, 11.

 

The new upright sprinklers are limited to 100 square foot maximum spacing.
Is there any good option/allowance where we could just replace the heads and
keep the spacing? Or are we going to need to relocate every fourth head to
maintain 10-foot spacing all the way down the branch line.

 

I'm pretty sure FM Global allows for this, but I haven't found anything in
NFPA 13 outside of the ESFR section. It sure seems like if it's appropriate
for ESFR heads (arguably the most finicky with regard to
spacing/obstructions) that the same spacing should be OK for standard spray
sprinklers.

 

Kyle Montgomery

 cid:[email protected]

Aero Automatic Sprinkler Co.

21605 N. Central Ave.

Phoenix, AZ 85024

Direct: 623.580.7820

Cell: 602.763.4736

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to