Have they ever clarified what kind of “confusion” they are trying to avoid?

Is there a difference in how a fire department deals with a wet system vs a dry 
system?

Matt

From: Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org> On Behalf 
Of Ron Greenman via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 4:08 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Ron Greenman <rongreen...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

Mike, that would be a non-functional fire protection device that has the 
appearance of functioning as described in 901.4.5 and would be required to be 
removed as proscribed therein. This DPV though it would no longer operate as a 
DPV would still function as a fire protection device, allowing water to flow 
through it to open sprinkler heads. In fact it would perform better than 
originally designed as the dry pipe trip and delivery time lag would be 
eliminated and the design area would be at 30% larger than a wet system would 
need and based on a lower C-Factor. Plus failure due to problems only 
encountered in dry systems would be eliminated.


Ron Greenman

rongreen...@gmail.com<mailto:rongreen...@gmail.com>

253.576.9700

The Universe is monstrously indifferent to the presence of man. -Werner Herzog, 
screenwriter, film director, author, actor and opera director (1942-)


On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 1:00 PM Michael Hill via Sprinklerforum 
<sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>>
 wrote:
While it seems trivial to us who deal with it for a living, imagine the 
building caught fire and there were fire/smoke/water damages. I bet an 
insurance company lawyer could convince others that if the existing dry pipe 
valve was modified, there is no way of telling what else “didn’t meet code” 
with the system. Why take a chance. What about removing power to a fire pump 
but leaving it in place and connected to the water supply. Where would you draw 
the line.

Mike Hill

From: Sprinklerforum 
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org>]
 On Behalf Of Ron Greenman via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 3:54 PM
To: 
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
Cc: Ron Greenman <rongreen...@gmail.com<mailto:rongreen...@gmail.com>>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

Mark, I think that you're referencing 901.4.5 (in the 2012 edition of the IFC) 
but that is addressing systems that appear to be life safety or fire protection 
systems but don't function as such. A common example is a camera disguised as a 
sprinkler head. In John's case it would still function as a fire protection 
device.

Don, As to listing, it would definitely no longer meet its listing, but since 
it was turned into just a fancy piece of pipe would it matter?

John, As to the FM, would ne be satisfied if were strip down of obvious DPV 
like the air line and the water motor line, have the holes plugged, and have it 
marked as no longer being any kind of valve?


Ron Greenman

rongreen...@gmail.com<mailto:rongreen...@gmail.com>

253.576.9700

The Universe is monstrously indifferent to the presence of man. -Werner Herzog, 
screenwriter, film director, author, actor and opera director (1942-)


On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:33 PM Mark.Phelps via Sprinklerforum 
<sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>>
 wrote:
There is an obscure section in the fire code that essentially says you’re not 
allowed to have anything in a sprinkler system that doesn’t function as what it 
appears to be.

Anyone know the chapter and verse on this?
Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 24, 2019, at 12:19 PM, John Paulsen via Sprinklerforum 
<sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>>
 wrote:
Yes, you could do that, but you would have to dismount the DPV. We are trying 
to determine if removing the clapper and installing a flow switch is a 
“prohibited” procedure.

John Paulsen – SET
Sprinkler System Design & Sales
Silco Fire and Security
2345 Southwest Blvd.
Grove City, OH 43123
P-614-449-2101 Ext. 3367
F-614-449-2007
C-614-348-8206



From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On 
Behalf Of Mark.Phelps via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 3:15 PM
To: 
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
Cc: Mark.Phelps <mphe...@aerofire.com<mailto:mphe...@aerofire.com>>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] FW: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

Just curious, but wouldn’t it be about the same to just replace the valve with 
a spool?
Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 24, 2019, at 12:08 PM, John Paulsen via Sprinklerforum 
<sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>>
 wrote:


From: John Paulsen
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 10:06 AM
To: Sprinklerforum 
<sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org>>
Subject: Dry Pipe Valve to Wet

Good Day Everyone!

A question has come up regarding the practice of taking the clapper out of a 
dry pipe valve in order to convert the system from dry pipe to wet pipe. We 
have had local AHJ’s demand that the valve itself be changed to avoid confusion 
for the first responders, but I was wondering if anyone on the forum knew of a 
specific code reference that would prohibit removing the clapper and leaving 
the DPV in place?

Thanks in Advance,

John Paulsen – SET
Sprinkler System Design & Sales
Silco Fire and Security
2345 Southwest Blvd.
Grove City, OH 43123
P-614-449-2101 Ext. 3367
F-614-449-2007
C-614-348-8206


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.firesprinkler.org_listinfo.cgi_sprinklerforum-2Dfiresprinkler.org&d=DwICAg&c=wn3mZQLIuInh2ClcJ0_DIA&r=dLwiR71i_XhSFqam3ZLeaFLiQJ3cDTUB0ReB4-yDDcg&m=eFKzVOzpKyeMvJp0mTEEelBwXLf6OKDPUZ-_OY5E3t8&s=B90DKgjKNCUTNp_BFOdO_a9DaTX3l6M4u_7zCQoprpw&e=<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2furldefense.proofpoint.com%2fv2%2furl%3fu%3dhttp-3A__lists.firesprinkler.org_listinfo.cgi_sprinklerforum-2Dfiresprinkler.org%26d%3dDwICAg%26c%3dwn3mZQLIuInh2ClcJ0_DIA%26r%3ddLwiR71i_XhSFqam3ZLeaFLiQJ3cDTUB0ReB4-yDDcg%26m%3deFKzVOzpKyeMvJp0mTEEelBwXLf6OKDPUZ-_OY5E3t8%26s%3dB90DKgjKNCUTNp_BFOdO_a9DaTX3l6M4u_7zCQoprpw%26e%3d&c=E,1,XuT8SN58Oba91okBGXIYhrSAYPEalEreRE4FXeJgiO050xLCe_R3610CofcIw6bzIZQQjGVhBQtsNo9tRjVq_Bl-BC20zv5X52dO-0ADvUtlp_1iVM2q3ihdEkwX&typo=1>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.firesprinkler.org_listinfo.cgi_sprinklerforum-2Dfiresprinkler.org&d=DwICAg&c=wn3mZQLIuInh2ClcJ0_DIA&r=dLwiR71i_XhSFqam3ZLeaFLiQJ3cDTUB0ReB4-yDDcg&m=Qi814SskoS25kTQqZ9f7KTPoINGV9-DI2T9Mn7AeIHU&s=1jfyWhJmiYjADoWN3yFQwnXw-W3Uj_mVkEEZrYWqXcE&e=<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2furldefense.proofpoint.com%2fv2%2furl%3fu%3dhttp-3A__lists.firesprinkler.org_listinfo.cgi_sprinklerforum-2Dfiresprinkler.org%26d%3dDwICAg%26c%3dwn3mZQLIuInh2ClcJ0_DIA%26r%3ddLwiR71i_XhSFqam3ZLeaFLiQJ3cDTUB0ReB4-yDDcg%26m%3dQi814SskoS25kTQqZ9f7KTPoINGV9-DI2T9Mn7AeIHU%26s%3d1jfyWhJmiYjADoWN3yFQwnXw-W3Uj_mVkEEZrYWqXcE%26e%3d&c=E,1,mdIjuW4yLFhrx8tEq6DEPM6IheUq1MxBk8EMeyWf8VOQ28gPM57SYB75sDcxSvztUIoecuK_X1SKlk8qsJ92-vbp7NiqvTE_nG_ZgaNzz9xoUtg,&typo=1>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flists.firesprinkler.org%2flistinfo.cgi%2fsprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org&c=E,1,9n_aA2BzPWfGTJOt3U8-MhMyX4oww387xoK9URW5zSprDhYTrI1nmIPhO0GeKEL_db11sS1Rsgzzcxyh00Ff5oX3L6izNWpQuXhdoONOqr1O6jWt3bQ,&typo=1>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flists.firesprinkler.org%2flistinfo.cgi%2fsprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org&c=E,1,8YgKGHwl6T9gSXcQtpHOVIToK2AQYC8m59jcAv-ANe3s0iXg6yuMwwgHqP3F6nRBHmQrRCjBOvZxZC3T2gZljMaaAZnHBnFIQo-aFxdnygacj3JFouB_&typo=1>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to