See the video below.  Fast forward to the spray foam test at about 3
minutes in.  Spoiler: flashover takes 44 seconds.  Since you are probably
acting as the only fire professional on this project, I would suggest you
share the video with your customer so they understand the gravity of the
situation.  They should invest in a very expensive system.  If it were me,
I would flood the thing, fast.  I know there are some foams that have a
fire retardant mixed in, but I'm not sure what kind of impact it would have.

https://youtu.be/mUPp-Ipt-Pk


Good luck,
Skyler Bilbo
Wente Plumbing and Fire Protection




On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 4:21 PM David L. Miller, P.E. via Sprinklerforum <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Does anyone have advice as to how one would calculate a "spray booth" for
> spraying foam insulation that is approximately 90' tall X 25' diameter with
> five levels of working platforms?
>
>
>
> Typically, when I have done paint booths for vehicles (even as large as
> fire
> trucks) I have calculated the system as a deluge system because of concerns
> regarding flames in a vapor cloud opening heads throughout the booth.  In
> this case, there will likely be 8 - 10 sprinklers at each level of the
> working platforms plus 20 sprinklers at the roof (due to structural
> obstructions).  This totals 60 - 70 sprinklers flowing at Extra Hazard
> Group
> 2 densities if the system is treated as a deluge system for hydraulic
> calculation purposes.
>
>
>
> NFPA 33:9.6.3 (also NFPA 13:26.4.1.4) "The water supply shall be sufficient
> to supply all sprinklers likely to open in any one fire incident without
> depleting the available water for use in hose streams."
>
>
>
> I am wondering about the likelihood of sprinklers at the roof operating
> simultaneously with multiple levels of sprinklers below the operating
> platforms.  Or, as the Annex to NFPA 33:9.6.3 puts it, what is a "credible
> fire scenario" for a spray booth such as this?
>
>
>
> Is it a reasonable assumption that sprinklers installed 15' AFF will
> operate
> while the flame front continues to open sprinklers at different elevations
> up to and including the roof level at approximately 90' AFF?  Conversely,
> is
> it reasonable to make the assumption that a fire will not open all of the
> sprinklers?
>
>
>
> If I had an unlimited water supply I would simply calculate the system as a
> deluge system.  If I had an unlimited budget, I would make each level a
> separate deluge system with flame detectors at each level.  Unfortunately,
> we do not operate with unlimited water supplies and unlimited budgets.
>
>
>
> Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
>
>
> David L. Miller, P.E.
>
> Engineered Fire Protection, LLC
>
> 11920 Richcroft Avenue
>
> Baton Rouge, Louisiana  70814
>
> 225-273-5040
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to