And don't set the fire department up for failure.
    On Wednesday, February 21, 2024 at 02:14:09 PM EST, John Denhardt 
<jdenha...@firesprinkler.org> wrote:  
 
 Rick’s and Steve’s comments are spot on. Give the fire department what they 
need/want. Do not install something that no one will ever use in an emergency 
condition. 
John

John August Denhardt, P.E.Vice-President Engineering and Technical 
ServicesAmerican Fire Sprinkler Association 301-343-1457

On Feb 21, 2024, at 13:30, Rick Matsuda <rick26...@gmail.com> wrote:




Steve’s guidance is the best. When it comes to hose valves and standpipe 
requirements, always verify with the AHJ to find out what they want. Rick

On Feb 21, 2024, at 12:09 PM, Steve Leyton <st...@protectiondesign.com> wrote:





To Rick’s comments:

Concur, and also offer that while the standard doesn’t require a valve where 
there is no roof access, I am aware of numerous AHJ’s who do.   The stated 
intent of the rooftop connection(s) is to enable forward flow testing of the 
system.   However – and this goes to my mantra of many years now – it is 
incumbent on the designer to verify with the serving FD is they require roof 
connections that they may use for firefighting.   I have been made aware of 
several fire incidents that used roof connection hose streams  and I am also 
aware of fireground strategies that encompass these connections.  
 
  
 
The foregoing is my opinion only and does not represent NFPA or the NFPA 14 
Technical Committee, nor intended to serve as an interpretation of the standard.
 
  
 
Steve L.
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
From: Rick Matsuda <rick26...@gmail.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 9:51 AM
To: Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers 
<sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: NFPA 14 2019 Hose Connection on the Roof
 
  
 
This is my opinion only from what I remember after being retired for ten years. 
 
  
 
The requirement for installing a hose valve is driven by the stairway 
requirements found in the building code which requires at least one stairway 
providing access to the roof. 
 
  
 
If the stairway extends to the roof, then a hose valve is required at the top 
landing or on the roof. 
 
  
 
If there is no roof access from the stairway, then no hose valve is required. 
 
  
 
The fire service will use the hose valve where they have safe access from the 
stairway but they will not walk across the roof dragging fire hose to hook up 
to a hose valve located where no safe access was provided. 
 
Rick Matsuda 
 



 

On Feb 21, 2024, at 10:47 AM, Fpdcdesign <fpdcdes...@gmail.com> wrote:
 



 
There are people here with more experience than I,  but if one outlet goes to 
the roof, the requirement is met. 
 
  
 




 

On Feb 21, 2024 at 11:34 AM, <Joe Burtell [MT-BILL]> wrote:
 
If I have 3 stair towers and the middle on has access to the roof and I provide 
a connection as required by 7.3.2.7* “Hose connections shall be provided at the 
highest landing of stairways with stairway access to a roof”, do the other (2) 
not have to go to the roof because of 7.3.2.9.2 “The hose connection required 
by 7.3.2.9 shall not be required where at least one hose connection in 
accordance with 7.3.2.7 is provided in the building”.
 
 
 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 

<image001.jpg>  |

 |

 |

 | 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
Joe​​​​
  |

 | 
| 
 
  |

 | 
| 
Burtell
  |

 |

 |
| 
| 
Fire Sprinkler Manager
  |

 |

 |

 |

 |
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
D
  |

 |
| 
| 
C
  |

 |

 | 
| 
| 
 
  |

 |
| 
| 
 
  |

 |

 | 
| 
| 
406-204-4653
  |

 |
| 
| 
406-861-4507
  |

 |

 |

 |

 |

 |

 |

 |
| 
| 
| 
3004 1st Ave South
  |

 |
| 
| 
| 
| 
Billings
  |

 | 
| 
, 
  |

 | 
| 
MT
  |

 | 
| 
 59101
  |

 |

 |
| 
| 
| 
Office: 
  |

 | 
| 
406‑652‑7697
  |

 |

 |

 |

 |
| 
www.summitfiresecurity.com
  |

 |

 |

 |

 |

 |

 |
| 
| 
This information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for the 
person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or 
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this 
in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this information.
  |

 |

 |

 |


_________________________________________________________ SprinklerForum 
mailing 
list:https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
 To unsubscribe send an email tosprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org
 


<image001.jpg>
_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org

_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org
_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org
_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org  
_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to