American Fire Sprinkler Association

12750 Merit Dr., Suite 350 Dallas TX 75251

Ph: (214) 349-5965   Fax: (214) 276-0908


---------------------------------

TECHNICAL UPDATE

July 31, 2009

---------------------------------


╥NFPA 13R does not provide a definition of a corridor. Webster╒s  
Dictionary defines a corridor as a passageway (as in a hotel or office  
building) in which compartments or rooms open. There has been  
substantial debate as to what actually constitutes a corridor for  
determination of sprinkler protection.  There is nothing in the  
definition that would differentiate a breezeway from an open and  
attached corridor. The typical breezeway is open to the atmosphere at  
both ends and is attached to a part of the structure itself. Are there  
size requirements for the opening or is it just the lack of a barrier  
(door, window, etc.) between the corridor and the outside?╙


We have reviewed the 2002 and 2007 Edition of NFPA 13 as the  
applicable standards. Our informal interpretation is that NFPA 13R  
will not require sprinkler protection for open and attached corridors.


The IBC likewise will not require sprinkler protection as long as  
sprinklers are not being used to reduce the rated separation from the  
interior of the building.  The 6.8.4 2002 Edition) of NFPA 13R  
indicates that sprinklers are not required in any porches, balconies,  
corridors, and stairs that are open and attached.  The corridor for  
your application is open at both ends and would meet this requirement.  
NFPA's Automatic Sprinkler Systems Handbook provides an explanation of  
an open corridor as being one that empties to an outside stairway and  
has no doors. They also use the wraparound corridor that is typical of  
a two- or three-story motel as an example where sprinklers are not  
required. The open and attached corridors issue was addressed during  
the A2009 Report on Comments.  A comment was made to add figures to  
clarify the application of this section in 13R-18 Log #6 to the 2010  
Edition of NFPA 13R but the committee rejected that comment. However,  
the Committee Statement was that the figures show corridors that are  
open to the outside, exposed to freezing temperatures and these are  
spaces where sprinklers can be omitted. The committee did accept annex  
material in the A2009 Report on Comments in 13R-19 with an Accept in  
Principle that will state, ╥An example of an open corridor or  
breezeway is one that is exposed to the outside atmosphere  
(temperature) and empties to an unenclosed stairway and has no doors  
attached to it. Another example is an exterior wraparound corridor  
that is typical in a two- to three-story motel.╙ The wording was  
commentary text from the handbook and was brought forward as annex  
material for clarification.  The committee did not specify a size  
requirement for the opening.

-----------------

Technical Update is prepared by the Technical Services Dept. of the  
AFSA: Vice President of Engineering and Technical Services Roland  
Huggins, a PE registered in fire protection engineering; Phill Brown,  
a NICET IV certified automatic sprinkler technician and NFPA Certified  
Fire Protection Specialist (CFPS) and Tom Wellen, a degreed fire  
protection engineering technologist. This is provided with the  
understanding that the AFSA assumes no liability for this opinion or  
actions taken on it and they are not to be considered the official  
position of the NFPA or its technical committees.


  Copyright ⌐ 2009, American Fire Sprinkler Association.  All Rights  
Reserved


--------------------------

If you╒d rather not receive future faxes from AFSA, fax your removal  
request to Linda Dawson at Efax (214) 242-3155 or call toll free (888)  
839-4830 or send e-mail request @ [email protected].   Please  
include your company name and the specific fax numbers(s) at which you  
do not wish to receive faxes from us.  Our failure to comply with your  
request may be unlawful.



_______________________________________________
Sprinklernotes mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklernotes

Reply via email to