American Fire Sprinkler Association
12750 Merit Dr., Suite 350 * Dallas TX 75251
Ph:(214) 349-5965         Fax:(214) 276-0908

---------------------
TECHNICAL UPDATE
NOVEMBER 5, 2009
---------------------

“When inspecting a plastic pipe fire sprinkler system with an anti- 
freeze loop extension, how do you test the anti-freeze solution to  
verify that it is glycerin rather than propylene glycol?”

We have reviewed NFPA 25, 2008 Edition that you indicated as the  
applicable standard. Our informal interpretation is that an indirect  
field test can be conducted.

I am unaware of a field test to verify the antifreeze is glycerin. In  
talking with the Noble Company, it is possible to conduct a field test  
to verify that the solution is not glycol (both ethylene and  
propylene). They have test strips that will identify the presence of  
glycol by changing colors whereas no change occurs for glycerin. Plain  
water will not react either but performing the concentration test for  
glycerin will resolve that issue. Although these test strips will  
confirm that the glycol concentration is sufficient to provide freeze  
protection, they are used for testing boilers and do not provide the  
accuracy required for testing sprinkler systems. They can be used as a  
quick and dirty field test to exclude the presence of glycol. If you  
do encounter glycol in a CPVC system, you should have a sample tested  
by a laboratory.

NFPA 25 only requires that the concentration be tested to ensure it is  
within the proper temperature range.  Unfortunately, the annex states  
that in a CPVC system, the solution SHOULD be verified to be glycerin  
based. Despite the annex opening paragraph saying: 'Annex A is not a  
part of the requirements of this standard but is included for  
informational purposes only.', section A.5.3.4 is a problem. I don't  
believe it is the intent of NFPA 25 to have a sample sent to a  
laboratory every time the antifreeze system is tested since that  
conflicts with section 1.2 that identifies the purpose is to ensure a  
REASONABLE degree of protection. A final note on this annex material  
is to keep in mind that NFPA 25 applies to the system owner and they  
can hire others to do portions of the inspection, testing, and  
maintenance requirements.



-----------------
Technical Update is prepared by the Technical Services Dept. of the  
AFSA: Vice President of Engineering and Technical Services Roland  
Huggins, a PE registered in fire protection engineering; Phill Brown,  
a NICET IV certified automatic sprinkler technician and NFPA Certified  
Fire Protection Specialist (CFPS) and Tom Wellen, a degreed fire  
protection engineering technologist.  This is provided with the  
understanding that the AFSA assumes no liability for this opinion or  
actions taken on it and they are not to be considered the official  
position of the NFPA or its technical committees.

Copyright © 2009, American Fire Sprinkler Association.  All Rights  
Reserved
--------------------------
If you'd rather not receive future faxes from AFSA, fax your removal  
request to Amy Sweeney at Efax (214) 242-3155 or call toll free (888)  
839-4830 or send e-mail request @ [email protected].   Please  
include your company name and the specific fax numbers(s) at which you  
do not wish to receive faxes from us.  Our failure to comply with your  
request may be unlawful.


_______________________________________________
Sprinklernotes mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklernotes

Reply via email to