sprinklernotes
Unsprinklered Combustible Concealed Spaces and the 3000 sq. ft. design area 
increase


You have asked the following questions: “We have a flat roof framed with solid 
wood joists filled with insulation and with a gypsum board attached to the 
joist. Directly above the joists, we have crickets formed by solid wood members 
and divided into 160 cu. ft. spaces by the solid wood members. The cricket area 
is separated from the joist below with a solid layer of plywood. Above the 
cricket is another layer plywood with a layer of rigid insulation and 
thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) roofing membrane on top. Sprinklers are not 
required in the crickets per Section 8.15.1.2.5, however, the AHJ is 
questioning whether the design area for the sprinklered space below needs to be 
increased 3,000 sq. ft. for the hydraulic calculations per Section 
11.2.3.1.5.2(4). In our situation, we have fully insulated areas below and 
above the cricket bays. Would that meet the intent of the exception for the 
3,000 sq. ft. calculation?” In response to your question, we have reviewed NFPA 
13, 2016 edition as the applicable standard. Our informal interpretation is 
would not require the 3,000 sq. ft. design area increase.

Even though these crickets do not exactly meet one of the 10 unsprinklered 
combustible concealed spaces that do not require an increase to the design area 
listed in Section 11.2.3.1.5.2, they do meet the intent of the section. The 
intent of Section 11.2.3.1.5.1 is to prevent a fire that could start in the 
unprotected space from breaking-out in multiple locations in the protected 
area. This could cause the sprinkler system to be overwhelmed and the fire 
would not be controlled (the purpose of the sprinkler system is to control the 
fire.) The intent of increasing the design area, thus the available water to 
the sprinkler system, is to still be able to control the fire if this were to 
happen. The 10 unsprinklered combustible concealed spaces provided in Section 
11.2.3.1.5.2 are situations where the fire propagating around the 1,500 sq. ft. 
design area is extremely unlikely due to the lack of fuel load to allow the 
fire to propagate, low probability of ignition, and/or low probability of the 
fire breaking out of the concealed space. In the case of exception number 4, a 
limited- or non-combustible ceiling is required to reduce the potential for the 
fire to readily break-out of the concealed space. This particular exception 
aligns very well with your installation though it does require one to look at 
the entire assembly and not just the membrane immediately bounding the bottom 
of the concealed. In a typical case it is only a layer of gypsum separating the 
concealed space from the protected area beneath it. In this case, there is a 
layer of gypsum with additional layers of insulation and plywood. This makes it 
even less likely for the fire to break-out of the concealed space, which is the 
intent of Section 11.2.3.1.5.2. With this being the case, the cricket assembly 
presents an equivalent installation to the defined exception number 4. 
Equivalencies are allowed per Section 1.5 which states: Nothing in this 
standard is intended to prevent the use of systems, methods, or devices of 
equivalent or superior quality, strength, fire resistance, effectiveness, 
durability, and safety over those prescribed by this standard.

However, this should be discussed with the local AHJ and a written agreement 
with this interpretation should be obtained (or at least an email sent to the 
AHJ identifying the outcome of the discussion) before proceeding further with 
the project.

Another way to view this installation is having the ceiling defined by the top 
of the occupied protected area and not the immediate bottom of the concealed 
space which would avoid the need for an evaluation of intent of Section 
11.2.3.1.5.2. As such, it then immediate complies with the requirement for a 
noncombustible material. This could have been simply stated as the 
interpretation but a discussion on the intent seemed a much better approach.


Reply via email to