sprinklernotes
Obstructions and ESFR Sprinklers Protecting Light & Ordinary Hazard Occupancies

 

 

 

You asked the following questions: “Sections 8.4.6.6 and 8.4.7.3 allow ESFR and 
CMSA sprinklers to protect light and ordinary hazard occupancies. While Section 
8.5.5.3.3 requires sprinklers of the same type under obstructions as installed 
at the ceiling Section 8.5.5.2.2 requires that minimum distances and special 
requirements of Sections 8.6 through 8.12 to be followed with regards to truss 
webs, and chords, pipes, columns, and fixtures. Without addressing obstruction 
criteria for CMSA and ESFR sprinklers in light and ordinary hazard occupancies, 
the obstruction criteria in Sections 8.11.5.3 and 8.12.5 still seem to govern 
although they would normally be expected to be installed in storage 
occupancies. In a light or ordinary hazard occupancy, although it is not 
stated, would it be reasonable not to require additional sprinklers below 
obstructions that are 4 ft. or less in width as long as the spray pattern can 
fully develop? Given the volume of water CMSA and ESFR systems are designed to 
deliver and the significantly lower fuel loads and rates of heat release 
expected in a light or ordinary hazard occupancy, it would seem reasonable to 
expect control (for CMSA) or suppression (for ESFR) of fires. This can be 
expected as long as the sprinkler spray pattern is allowed to fully develop 
where deflector clearances of 36 in. above the top of an obstruction can be 
provided.” In response to your question, we have reviewed NFPA 13, 2016 edition 
as the applicable standard. Our informal interpretation is the when using CMSA 
and ESFR sprinklers the obstruction requirements for those sprinklers shall 
apply.

 

Sections 8.4.6.6 and 8.4.7.3 were added for situations where an existing 
warehouse with an ESFR or CMSA sprinkler system is being converted to a light 
or ordinary hazard occupancy. The intent was not for new construction since 
ESFR and CMSA sprinklers are specifically designed for storage occupancies. 
This is explained in the commentary for these section in the NFPA 13 Handbook. 
This is further supported by the lack of requirements in Sections 8.11 and 8.12 
requiring that Section 8.5 shall apply unless modified by these sections. 
Typically, if the standard intended for us to apply the standard spray 
sprinkler obstruction requirements when protecting light or ordinary hazard 
occupancies both Sections 8.11 and 8.12 would send us back to Section 8.6. 
Instead, specific requirements in Sections 8.11 and 8.12 are to be followed. 
Both chapters have their own requirements regarding obstruction based on fire 
testing results. This is due to both types of storage sprinklers being far more 
sensitive to obstructions, affecting the spray pattern and potentially cold 
soldering adjacent sprinklers. For example, pendent ESFR sprinklers are 
designed with a hole in the middle of the deflector. This provides a thrust in 
the center of the discharge pattern that forces a stronger flow of water in the 
middle. When even small continuous obstructions are directly beneath the 
deflector, it destroys the discharge pattern for that sprinkler. Section 
8.12.5.3.1(2) defines continuous obstructions as objects that are 2 in. or less 
in width and that are located a minimum of 2 ft. below the elevation of the 
sprinkler deflector or that are positioned a minimum of 1 ft. horizontally from 
the sprinkler. Even worse, the water bouncing off these objects can cause 
adjacent sprinklers to cold solder, keeping them from activating. Factory 
Mutual did a full-scale fire test that defined these parameters. Since the 
initial ESFR sprinkler was rendered ineffective by the obstruction and the 
adjacent sprinklers were effectively removed from attacking the fire, the test 
opened 27 sprinklers before they manually suppressed the fire. An impressive 
failure caused by one small obstruction. Thus, when using CMSA and ESFR 
sprinklers the obstruction requirements for those sprinklers shall apply not 
matter what the occupancy classification may be.

 

It also bears repeating that CMSA and ESFR sprinklers are storage sprinklers 
and are not to be used for new construction of light and/or ordinary hazard 
occupancies.



Reply via email to