By the way, the main reason why I chose to distribute Spyder for Windows platforms using Python(x,y) plugins is that all the other one-click GUI-based installers are not handling the uninstall process (which is kind of disappointing...).
-Pierre 2011/11/17 Pierre Raybaut <[email protected]>: > Absolutely, this is an issue with the packaging tool which is the > Python(x,y) plugin framework. > > I'll do some tests in virtual machines to understand why it goes wrong. > > -Pierre > > 2011/11/17 anatoly techtonik <[email protected]>: >> On Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:13:08 AM UTC+3, Pierre Raybaut wrote: >>> >>> Actually, Spyder's Windows installers are Python(x,y) plugins, as you may >>> have noticed. As such, they are first intended to be executed on top of an >>> existing Python(x,y) distribution, and this is AFAIK working flawlessly. >>> Now, they are also designed to detect an existing standard Python >>> installation, so this is clearly a bug. >> >> What is used to create these installers? Is it distutils or setuptools or >> distrutils2? It seems the bug is in packaging tool that insert code which is >> unable to detect x64 Python versions and hence should be reported upstream. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "spyder" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/spyderlib/-/xZs1G6R6jA0J. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.
