Great news, Spyder has now its Wikipedia page here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spyder_(software)

Thanks for your work, Anatoly.

-Pierre

On 2 avr, 11:48, anatoly techtonik <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Pierre Raybaut
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In the meantime, I've started processing this task:
> >http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/issues/detail?id=981
>
> > BTW, when you look at those wiki pages:
> > *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stani%27s_Python_Editor
> > *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PyScripter
> > ...you'll see that they have absolutely no real external references,
> > so I'm beginning to think that our reviewers are a bit harsh with our
> > submission!
>
> > Could this be an argument to push our submission?
>
> Yes. I think so. Even if it will result in big cleansing of Wikipedia
> for Python editors, at least everybody in Python community will
> receive a signal. However, there should be somebody else to raise the
> argument as I've already raised a similar one in the past, after which
> editors just stacked some links for the editors in question.
> --
> anatoly t.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spyder" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.

Reply via email to