Hi. Thanks for the heads up. I wondered why so many IPython references are still in `external console` plugin if it is not going to handle IPython. Now it is clear that `external console` will still handle IPython to a some degree. Although it is not clear what for?
Perhaps an outline (a blog post perhaps?) about roles between IPython kernels and clients in relation to Spyder IDE will make it more interesting for developers out there. P.S. I am actually not a fan of mixins - they are hard to reverse tracing. You know - "debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.', so unless there is clear distinction of roles in derived classes, I'd think twice before using them. Mixin is like "from blablabla import *" - it's useful sometimes, but not it not a good idea in general case. =) -- anatoly t. On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Carlos Córdoba <[email protected]> wrote: > I think for now I'm gonna add more IPython options to our config page. Very > interesting stuff the mixin idea: with it we can share code between our > widgets and the ipython one. Awesome! > > Hope to see you next week, > Carlos > > El 28/05/12 10:13, Pierre Raybaut escribió: > >> IPython<0.12 support was dropped from default repository (Spyder v2.2 >> branch) since Issue 1059 was closed: >> http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/issues/detail?id=1059 >> >> We are making interesting progress since last week -- see for example >> those issues: >> >> http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/issues/list?can=1&q=cat%3DIPythonConsole&colspec=ID+MS+Stars+Priority+Modified+Cat+Type+Status+Owner+Summary&cells=tiles >> >> The ultimate goal is to implement a self-consistent IPython console >> plugin which would handle both IPython clients and kernels (in the >> meantime, the external console plugin will handle the kernels as it is >> already doing in v21 branch): >> http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/issues/detail?id=1053 >> >> @Carlos: read carefully my last commits before continuing to play with >> the new IPython console plugin and its client widgets... >> >> Now I'm going to be offline for a few days, so see you next week guys! >> (and happy testing/coding!) >> >> Cheers, >> Pierre >> >> On 28 mai, 16:06, Carlos Córdoba<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Yep. that's right Anatoly. IPython 0.10 is unmaintained so Pierre decided >>> to drop it completely and move all our efforts to support 0.12. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Carlos >>> >>> 2012/5/28 anatoly techtonik<[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Looking at weekend commits - am I right that in Spyder 2.2 the minimum >>>> supported IPython version will be 0.12? >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups >>>> "spyder" group. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/spyderlib/-/n5AD9NObEYMJ. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "spyder" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.
