Last time Pierre said (and I still agree) that there are not good
multiplatform gui clients for git. Tortoisehg is very good and I think
Pierre is also distributing it with WinPython because he is using it for
his projects.
I'd say we should leave our issues in google-code and I'd be in favor of
moving our repos only if we could attract more contributors. But we
could just open a mirror to see if that's the case or not.
What do you think now Pierre?
El 17/12/12 16:44, Jed Ludlow escribió:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Carlos Córdoba <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
About Github: Given that all our devs are more fond of mercurial
than of git (especially because of Tortoisehg), I've been
considering to just open a github mirror (instead of doing a full
migration, which was my initial proposal). So all our issues and
development workflow will stay in google-code, but we could still
get contributions of people who prefer Github. This is very
important, because several people (like you) have manifested their
interest in contributing but have been disappointed by our lack of
a Github repo.
The previous discussions about Github are almost a year old now. At
the time, it looked like Google Code was actively moving toward
something that felt like Github, but that certainly hasn't
happened. Perhaps enough has changed in the world that a full move to
Github is now more logical than before.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "spyder" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"spyder" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.
