I'll be fine with maintaining just one repo. It'd make our lives easier but our current model is not that bad either.

Guys, I'll be mostly offline for three or four days. I was reviewing Jed's branches but i couldn't finish them. I'll try to merge them but can't promise anything, sorry.

Cheers,
Carlos

El 28/12/12 12:42, Jed Ludlow escribió:

    From a logistical perspective, are you thinking of a 2.2 release
    prior to the Python 3 migration? If so, it may make sense to
    either clone the default repository to a v22 or create a named v22
    branch inside of the default repo before the Python 3 migration
    work. I guess I'm wondering how much destabilization you expect
    from the Python 3 migration.


As an aside, I recognize that the previous Spyder release branch model has been to branch-by-clone. I happened to be browsing the main Python repository (a beautiful model for branchy development in a singe repository) the other day in TortoiseHg, and I couldn't help but notice how nicely it presented a clear picture of which branches were affected by each bug fix. See the attached screenshot. Fixes are applied at the lowest affected release and then merged on up the chain. It also shows how the 2.7 branch is being managed essentially on it's own since no merges ever originate from that branch. Furthermore, Tortoise provides the ability to show only one of the named branches, so if you want to see only the default branch you just show it alone. Tempting....
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spyder" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.

Reply via email to