For the next Fedora version (F19), the situation currently is:
PyQt 4.10: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/PyQt4
Spyder v2.1.13: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/spyder


On 10 March 2013 16:15, David Verelst <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ubuntu 13.04 is still on spyder 2.1.10, but moved on to PyQt 4.10 which,
> of course, offers kind of an unusable situation
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/python-spyderlib
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/python-qt4
> Launchpad bug report:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spyder/+bug/1153216
>
> Debian is using spyder 2.1.10 on sid and wheezy, but is using PyQt 4.9
> (which shouldn't trigger the version checking inconstancy I assume)
> http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=spyder
> http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=pyqt
>
> Haven't looked at the other distro's yet.
>
> Does it make sense to release a 2.14 that contains this fix? I have no
> idea who is taking care of the Ubuntu packages, but they are still on a
> version dating back to May 2012 (v2.10) so it seems they have some catching
> up to do.
>
> Regards,
> David
>
>
> On 8 March 2013 14:46, David Verelst <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think there is an additional problem with Ipython. A similar version
>> checking approach raises an error for not satisfying the pyqt > 4.7
>> version. See for more details issue 1302:
>> https://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/issues/detail?id=1302, and the
>> ipython issue and pull request to fix it:
>> https://github.com/ipython/ipython/pull/2831
>>
>> https://github.com/ipython/ipython/commit/8f7490775a79220641c59489c05e2aba0da2c293
>>
>> I am running Ipython from git to get around it.
>>
>> Regards,
>> David
>>
>>
>> On 8 March 2013 12:33, Pierre Raybaut <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for reporting this bug.
>>>
>>> Actually we are already aware of this unwanted behavior which is already
>>> fixed in both v21 and default (2.2) repositories:
>>> http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/issues/detail?id=1291
>>>
>>> The only question now is whether we should make an urgent release to fix
>>> this or not. Release v2.2.0 Final is not ready yet (there are still several
>>> issues that need to be addressed), so we could -if this is an urgent
>>> matter- release a new v2.1 version. Judging by the number of reports since
>>> PyQt v4.10 release, I get the impression that it could be urgent indeed.
>>>
>>> -Pierre
>>>
>>> Le 8 mars 2013 à 12:23, Rakesh Singh <[email protected]> a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> PyQt 4.10 has been released.
>>> The version check in requirements.py incorrectly fails, as the version
>>> is detected as 4.1 which is less than the minimum required 4.4
>>>  I merely changed my minimum version in requirements.py to be 4.04,
>>> which is the incorrect approach, but just a workaround :)
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "spyder" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "spyder" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spyder" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to