IPython guys called it "in-process" but I think "internal" is just fine.
El 02/06/13 00:50, anatoly techtonik escribió:
Hi,
I still find the name "internal shell" in Spyder confusing. It is not
Spyder's shell - it is a generic shell that can be embedded in any
Python process. Am I right about any or is it only suitable to
PyQt4/PySide Python apps?
I couldn't figure out the proper name, so I decided to ask how to
rename "internal shell" to reflect that it is a shell running in the
same process which calls it, and in this particular case the process
is Spyder?
It looks like it's worthy to be documented somewhere along wiki pages
<https://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/w/list>. For example, it is not
clear why this "internal shell" doesn't block the process? What is the
difference between internal and external shell and what is protocol is
used for communication in both cases?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "spyder" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"spyder" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
