I had the WinPython installation in a network drive. I moved it to the
local drive and now the autocompletion takes a normal amount of time.

Thanks!


On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Federico Barabas <[email protected]>wrote:

> I've done some more testing.
>
> Autocompletion in the editor is super slow only if the file being edited
> is long. In new files it's only slow for the first time of writing a
> command and the following calls are quick.
>
> Regarding the slow IPython autocomplete, I think it only happens after
> running the commands:
>
> %load_ext autoreload
> %autoreload 2
>
> any idea why?
>
> thanks again,
> Federico
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Federico Barabas 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Thank you Carlos
>>
>> Just today I also noticed that IPython also has speed issues. Showing the
>> output of simple commands like print('hey') can take ~5 seconds. Restarting
>> spyder fixes the problem momentarily.
>>
>> Maybe at this point I should state that I'm using a not-so-bad computer:
>> Intel i5
>> 8GB RAM
>> 64-bit Windows 7 SP1
>>
>> Let me know if I can help you in the debugging. I really want to keep on
>> using spyder, I think it's perfect for scientific use of Python.
>>
>> thanks again,
>> Federico
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Carlos Córdoba <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi Federico,
>>>
>>> I fixed this problem for 2.2.0 (i.e. about eight months ago), so the
>>> problem you are reporting has to be different and (maybe) it only applies
>>> to Windows and/or WinPython. I'll take a look at it when I have some time.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Carlos
>>>
>>> El 30/10/13 14:36, Federico Barabas escribió:
>>>
>>> I also use spyder in ArchLinux and there I don't have this issue
>>>
>>> El miércoles, 30 de octubre de 2013 11:28:29 UTC+1, Federico Barabas
>>> escribió:
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone!
>>>>
>>>>  Is there an update on this?
>>>>
>>>>  I have the slow autocompletion issue, even with print command it
>>>> hangs for ~5s after writing "print(". The second time may be a bit faster
>>>> but only slightly. I'd say it happens with every module.
>>>>
>>>>  I was playing around with this in a big code I'm working on and I
>>>> noticed that the slow autocompletion only takes place inside if and loops
>>>> but not in the non-indented code. Maybe this is useful for debugging, I
>>>> don't know.
>>>>
>>>>  My system:
>>>> Windows 7
>>>> Portable WinPython 64bit 3.3.2.3
>>>> Spyder 2.3.0dev6 with rope 0.9.4
>>>>
>>>>  Cheers,
>>>> Federico
>>>>
>>>> El jueves, 10 de enero de 2013 16:48:44 UTC+1, Carlos Córdoba escribió:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Don't worry about it, this issue is hard to describe in words but
>>>>> easy to see in a video, that's why I think we don't have an issue for it.
>>>>>
>>>>> So what I meant is that it's a well known issue to the development
>>>>> team but probably most users are not fully aware of it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>
>>>>> El 10/01/13 10:37, Nelson Brown escribió:
>>>>>
>>>>> Carlos,
>>>>> Thanks for looking into it.
>>>>>
>>>>>  I guess my googling skills aren't what I think they are... I was
>>>>> looking for an existing issue that was already reported and known, but I
>>>>> didn't find anything that was still open.
>>>>>
>>>>>  I appreciate your responsiveness and tolerance of noobs like me.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Cheers,
>>>>> Nelson
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, January 10, 2013 7:27:37 AM UTC-8, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Thanks for the video Nelson, it shows a well known (and pretty
>>>>>> annoying) problem. I'll try to fix it for 2.2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>
>>>>>> El 09/01/13 12:31, Nelson Brown escribió:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Carlos,
>>>>>> After some more poking with it, I'm not as annoyed with this as I was
>>>>>> in the past.  It seems that only the first autocompletion is slow, after
>>>>>> that the suggestions are much faster (but not instantaneous as in the
>>>>>> IPython console.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I noticed the issue with pylab and tables.  Here is a video of the
>>>>>> nuisance issue: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJQ7a03vz5w
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I don't have networkx, but core stuff like csv have fast
>>>>>> autocompletion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Maybe this will be helpful to you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Nelson
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 7:32:02 AM UTC-8, Carlos Córdoba wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Hi Nelson,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What library are you using when this happens? Some libraries (e.g.
>>>>>>> networkx) are very slow to show completions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If this is not the case for you, could you post a code snippet that
>>>>>>> clearly shows the problem?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> El 08/01/13 19:26, Nelson Brown escribió:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I also have this problem.  I can't remember when it started, but
>>>>>>> I've been avoiding Spyder because of it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  I did not find a rope.log file after running Spyder with --debug.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Previously I got Spyder2 with Python(x,y), but recently my laptop
>>>>>>> was re-imaged (Windows 7) and this time I'm trying WinPython. (So I'm
>>>>>>> looking in C:\WinPython-64bit-2.7.3.2\settings\.spyder2 for the
>>>>>>> rope.log.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Any other suggestions?  Spyder freezes (not responding) for
>>>>>>> several seconds whenever I type a dot.  It makes the editor unusable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Thanks,
>>>>>>> Nelson
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 8:35:48 PM UTC-8, Carlos Córdoba
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Matt,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Try to start Spyder from a terminal with the --debug option. Then
>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>> at your .spyder2 folder (in your Users directory) for a file called
>>>>>>>> rope.log to see if you can find what is causing the problem you
>>>>>>>> mention.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> El 26/11/12 10:32, matt escribió:
>>>>>>>> > I have been using Spyder regularly for over a year on Windows
>>>>>>>> with 64
>>>>>>>> > bit python 2.7(on several different machines).  Recently after
>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>> > changes to one of my systems(installing some c++ compilers
>>>>>>>> > and modifying my path variable) I am getting really slow code
>>>>>>>> > completion in the editor frame of Spyder.  Every time I type a
>>>>>>>> period,
>>>>>>>> > it takes like 5 seconds to process, kind of like it usually does
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> > the first code completion of the session.  As I changed a lot of
>>>>>>>> > things about my system, I can't seem to narrow down what actually
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> > impacting this portion of Spyder code.  Before I have to dive
>>>>>>>> into the
>>>>>>>> > Spyder code, can anyone suggest what might be causing this sort
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> > problem?
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>>>> > Matt
>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>> Google
>>>>>>>> > Groups "spyder" group.
>>>>>>>> > To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/spyderlib/-/CiL3u4TGZ6wJ.
>>>>>>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>>> > [email protected].
>>>>>>>> > For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>>>> > http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "spyder" group.
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/spyderlib/-/rT79q4p76bIJ.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/
>>>>>>> group/spyderlib?hl=en.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "spyder" group.
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>>>>> msg/spyderlib/-/BwqXoXkOPwkJ.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/
>>>>>> group/spyderlib?hl=en.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "spyder" group.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>>>> msg/spyderlib/-/L6h1PYNpEhwJ.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/
>>>>> group/spyderlib?hl=en.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "spyder" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>> Google Groups "spyder" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/spyderlib/TzBu8aYFTEk/unsubscribe.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spyder" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to