Hi,
This is really good! Please send us a pull request when you are ready so
we can to see the benefits of rpdb2 and see if it's worth to include
your work or not.
It's always great to see people wants to help us improve our debugging
capabilities, which still need some love :-) My only suggestion for now
is to include rpdb2 in spyderlib/utils/external and import it from
there, to not depend on having winpdb installed.
Cheers,
Carlos
El 03/01/14 12:01, Falldog Hsieh escribió:
I think spyder is good Python IDE, but defaul pdb is not power enough
I had try winpdb before, and it's debug capability more than spyder
include watch callstack, switch frame, thread debug, ...
http://winpdb.org/
winpdb module include rpdb2.py
I had fork the spyderlib in Bitbucket, and modify some code to testing
with rpdb2
https://bitbucket.org/Falldog/spyderlib
currently, it's just simple testing, click debug button, it will debug
with pdb & rpdb2 at the same time
now could set breakpoints and debug with "step", "next", "continue",
"return"
I am not sure it's good choice to implement new debugger with rpdb2
If that is the way, I will keep going
Please leave any suggestion for this, thanks
BTW
Move repository to Bitbucket is very good way!!! :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "spyder" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"spyder" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
