Hi Chris,
I understand your petition. Please open an issue so that I don't forget
to look into it. Else I'll forget it for sure ;-)
Cheers,
Carlos
El 05/02/15 a las 15:59, Christopher Snyder escribió:
This has come up often enough that I would like to make a feature
request of it. I don't know how to fix it, but I know what I would
like fixed very badly.
Suppose we have a line like:
return myFun( A.shape )
But blast!, we forgot that sometimes A is a list not an array, so we
go back
return myFun( np.array( A.shape <@> )
when your cursor is at the <@> symbol pressing ) replaces the existing
parenthesis instead of adding another one. Inevitably I hit f5 and
have to go back again.
Could we make it so that if you're clearly adding an addition set of
open-parenthesis that the parenthesis isn't replaced?.. sorry if
that's vague.
-Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "spyder" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"spyder" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
