Le samedi 27 février 2016 14:47:06 UTC, Carlos Córdoba a écrit : > > Hi, > > Thank you for contacting us about it. I think the least intrusive option > is: > > Patch Spyder 2.3.8 to disable the features relying on QtWebkit > > That would break our Object Inspector, but that's an annoyance that > unfortunately Debian users will have to put up with. > > Is this the only component that would be affected by the removal of qtwebkit?
Although I really, really would prefer that you would start to package > Spyder 3.0beta2 instead of doing that > It is on-going (I have QtPy and QtAwesome ready for submission). I would have to check for Jupyter. (because I don't want to deal with bug reports about the breakage that you > will introduce and that at the end is not our fault but your decision). > > It is just unfortunate that the update 2.3.x to 3.0 makes such a leap to the list of required dependencies. > Cheers, > Carlos > > PS. Moving 2.3.8 to PyQt5 is not an option, so please don't try it. > > I saw the corresponding branch on master, and indeed the changes introduced for PyQt5 support are quite massive. El 27/02/16 a las 08:44, Ghislain Vaillant escribió: > > I am contacting you on behalf of the package maintainers in Debian to > discuss the current status of the Spyder package in the archive and the > best course of actions moving forward. > > > The Spyder package is currently sync'd with the latest stable version > (2.3.8). However, it is currently affected by the following RC bug (planned > QtWebkit 4 removal), which prevents it to transition to the testing > distribution. We are planning to package Spyder 3.x at some point but quite > a few dependencies are currently missing or needs to be packaged (Jupyter, > QtAwesome...), so the process will take time. > > > Meanwhile, I would like to explore the possibility to maintain 2.3.8 a > little longer by removing the problematic dependency on qt4webkit. So far, > I can think of the following 2 options: > > - Patch / port spyder 2.3.8 to support PyQt5, perhaps using the existing > work on master. > > - Patch spyder 2.3.8 to disable the features relying on qt4webkit. > > - Other options? > > > Can I have your opinion on which option(s) sound the least painful from a > maintenance point-of-view. Or perhaps none of these are worth considering > because it would be too much work. Looking forward to your feedback. > > > Many thanks, > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "spyder" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <javascript:>. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
