Hi Anatoly,
We’re trying to follow semantic versioning, like this:
* X releases are meant to break our API (e.g. move files around and
rename important classes).
* X.y releases are meant to add new features that don’t require a
breakage in API.
* X.y.z releases are for bugfixes only.
So 3.1.0 introduced several new features (as you can see in our
changelog), but unfortunately we also introduced several ugly bugs (most
of them were fixed in 3.1.3).
However, we have taken the opportunity to increase our tests in the 3.1
series to reach a bit more than 50% in coverage (from 17% in 3.0.2, I
think).
Cheers,
Carlos
El 12/03/17 a las 09:39, anatoly techtonik escribió:
Ubuntu 16.04 ships with Spyder 3.0.2.As I know, Spyder doesn't provide
any 'stable' channel releases - every new version should be more
stable one. Is it more secure, more good for Ubuntu users to use 3.1.x
already?
Or maybe provide an automatic PPA that builds Spyder from tags?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "spyder" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"spyder" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
