David

I am not a lawyer nor an accountant but I would think this might work.

Set up one account number that is for the heading trust account.
set up the subsequent number for the actual funds (in and out)
follow it with the next sequential number which I would label trust
account total

The third account and the 1st one would be displayed on any formal list
with the middle number being the shuffling in and out of funds.

If more detail is required add accounts in the middle. You could even
have a number of sets of accounts each with their own subtotal heading
with the whole group being followed with the group total.

Remember that this is just an idea and not an informed opinion!!

Darald

On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 12:07, David Wolf wrote:
> I've been trying to get trust accounts to work the way I need them to 
> work. My first thought was to create a summary 'Trust Account" then add 
> new 'accounts' in the chart of accounts for each trade deal that 
> involves a trust account. But, that falls flat because there is no 
> 'summary' account option that I can find. So.. The question of the hour 
> is: how does one *properly* and *correctly* handle trust accounts in 
> SQL-Ledger?
> 
> David
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing 
> real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! 
> http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
> _______________________________________________________
> (un)subscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users
> Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing 
real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! 
http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
_______________________________________________________
(un)subscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users
Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to