In order for the Enter key to work focus must set to an input field. It won't work when you just select a name and then hit Enter. When you leave a dropdown list, cursor focus is not set, this is why nothing happens.
Dieter Simader http://www.sql-ledger.org (780) 472-8161 DWS Systems Inc. Accounting Software Fax: 478-5281 =========== On a clear disk you can seek forever =========== On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Rik Zandvoort wrote: > > I tried several browsers on both NT and OSX, but none of them performs > an 'Update Form' after choosing a Vendor Name and hitting return. OK, > as soon I come into a field like the Amount field, than the Enter > works. I did not check browsers on Linux however. > Besides, I was talking about minor things, I work with SL with great > joy already. > > Rik > > On woensdag, nov 6, 2002, at 18:49 Europe/Amsterdam, Dieter Simader > wrote: > > > > > The Enter key works on all the forms except the initial login and admin > > login screen. The "Update Form" button is the first button on a form > > and > > if you hit enter when your cursor is placed in a field it should update > > the form. > > > > > > Dieter Simader http://www.sql-ledger.org (780) 472-8161 > > DWS Systems Inc. Accounting Software Fax: 478-5281 > > =========== On a clear disk you can seek forever =========== > > > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Rik Zandvoort wrote: > > > >> > >> Using the Edmonton Demo v 1.9.1 the Payments section (AP only, AR not > >> yet?) seems to have changed. It took me a while to understand that you > >> have to 'Update Form' after filling in 'Amount' but it works really > >> nice and speeds up working, especially in cases where one single > >> amount > >> is payed for several invoices. > >> > >> Good work! (thanks) > >> > >> Rik > >> > >> p.s. > >> May be it is an old issue, but wouldn't it work easier if the Update > >> Form action would be invoked automatically when hitting 'Enter' after > >> selecting Vendor, so mouse usage is not necessary here, like after > >> entering Amount? Or is there a special (technical) reason why it is > >> implemented this way? > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
