On 20/05/10 12:32, David Godfrey wrote:
Hi Armaghan,
As I am sure you are aware, I currently use LedgerSMB 1.2.17 (should
have gone to 1.2.21 by now but work keeps getting in the way :(
Hi David, thanks for the reply. Yes I know and have read you
contributions too (excellent work) :)
We actually have to deal with this ourselves, our solution is simple
just create both a customer and a vendor record with the same name.
Actually I would like to automate this probably with database triggers.
I think I can keep the customernumber/vendornumber same for both rows
and then do other things based upon this common number.
We do not transfer balances from customer to vendor or the other way.
Personally for ease of tracking on the accounting side, I feel it is
easier to require that the customer actually pay every invoice I
issue, and I pay every invoice they issue to me.
You could create a "linked account update" function that automatically
does both a "cash payment" and "cash receipt" for this scenario, but I
feel that it needlessly complicates tracking, to say nothing of the
problems that could arise if the other party does not do the same.
I am not sure how to handle this bit or probably write a new
function/form to transfer/adjust balances between the same customer and
vendor. Will be great if some other users can share how they are doing
it right now.
Thanks
Armaghan
--
http://www.ledger123.com/
_______________________________________________
SQL-Ledger mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ledger123.com/mailman/listinfo/sql-ledger
