-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Armaghan,
please see below! Thanks for all your support. On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 06:47:55 +0500 Armaghan Saqib <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > I quickly went through the entire thread (with all the great feedback) > and here is what I am thinking. > > (1) Keeping in mind Chris suggestions, Bernd concerns and Rolf/SLNA > technical support, we shall probably change the data type. > I'm patiently waiting for somebody to convince me that the reconciliation problems (or any other problems) can be cured by changing the data type. > (2) Regarding "manual reconciliation" in Ledger123, I have made few > changes for my customers where, for some reasons, they don't have to > worry about beginning,ending balances and use SL/L123 reconciliation > feature to mark transactions which have been reconciled. > > Is there any concern if I add this as an optional checkbox to > Ledger123 so that when it is checked, Ledger123 does not check > beginning/ending balances? > No concerns about an optional checkbox. > Thanks and regards > Armaghan > _______________________________________________ > SQL-Ledger mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ledger123.com/mailman/listinfo/sql-ledger -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4qLx0ACgkQpYU8M8PbPV66vgCfdac72fgc6vpuugLt0bl1b4G0 ow0An36D5QeWNhnIgX7u0pquArw+S/5E =vfN/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ SQL-Ledger mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ledger123.com/mailman/listinfo/sql-ledger
