I recall reading that IIS (on Windows 2000) and SQL Server should NOT be 
on the same box. I believe the reason is that each product has a memory 
manager that wants to manage the entire box. This clash supposedly 
degrades the box quickly. You may want to see if there is any supporting 
information on the Web. hth

-brian


> Hi everybody... 
> 
> I hope this is the best place to post this.  I'm running out of options 
because nobody
seems to know what's causing this. 
> 
> I have a webserver... it's running Windows Server 2003 with all updates 
except SP2.  It's
running MS SQL Server 2000 with SP3a.  It's also running CF MX 7. 
> 
> This server is running a series of personal websites and message 
forums, on forum software
that I wrote myself about two years ago.  There are 6-8 forums running 
off of the same
codebase and database (the URL being the determining factor as to what 
content is
selected).  Ever since the forums started getting a lot of use, the 
server itself has
slowed to a crawl.  It's a P4-3.0 GHz machine with 1 gig of RAM. 
> 
> I'm 99.9% sure that the slowness problem is being caused my SQL 
Server.  When I run
PerfMon, I watch CPU utilization, Avg Disk Queue Length, and a few 
others.  The one to
note is Avg Disk Queue Length.  Whenever this item spikes and maxes out, 
the system stops
responding until the item drops off again.  It seems unrelated to CPU 
usage.  These spikes
last anywhere from 5-30 seconds, and again while it's spiked, nothing 
else on the server
can take place.  In some instances, a remote session with Terminal 
Services will freeze
up; otherwise it just gets really sluggish. 
> 
> These spikes go away if I pause or stop the SQL Server service.. but 
that's kinda
pointless since the sites won't run without it. 
> 
> There's only one database still in use on SQL Server now -- I've moved 
the rest to mySQL,
on the same box.  The one left is the big one -- the one the forums 
depend on.  BUT, my
users have said that the system feels less sluggish now.  I've noticed 
it's not as bad
either, but it still happens. 
> 
> I would go ahead and move this last database, but the migration tools 
for SQL Server to
mySQL are poor at best, at least the ones I've found.  It takes several 
hours to export
the data, and then several more to manually modify the SQL code it 
exports because of bugs
in the export script that I've been unable to correct. 
> 
> So I'm kinda stuck and unsure what to do next... 
> 
> Any ideas? 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:6:2272
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/6
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:6
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.6
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to