Peter, I can't keep up with the various references you're making to previous e-mails and I am having a hard time understanding your responses in general in some cases. Let's you and I just call it quits. I appreciate your help. However, I think we are not communicating well.
Thanks again, Rich On Mar 10, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Peter Boughton wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 18:54, Rich wrote: >> I don't know what you're talking about in both instances below. It >> sounds like you're reading responses from other people and taking >> them >> to be mine. > > From my perspective you replied to what I took to be Ray's response > to me. > > But it wasn't clear that Ray's response was actually to me, because > there was no quoting/addressing of the message. > > Hence why I pointed out that specific quoting of messages is a Good > Thing on mailing lists - because it helps remove this sort of > ambiguity. > > > If I've quoted a piece of text, I'm replying to the person that wrote > the text, regardless of whether a newer message might have arrived in > the meantime or whatever. > > > Meh. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/sql/message.cfm/messageid:3315 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/sql/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/sql/unsubscribe.cfm
