On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:23:11PM -0500, Mike Bayer wrote:
> if you change your naming convention, then that would show up as a bunch
> of brand new constraints in the model and a whole bunch of constraints
> removed in the model, so in theory would produce a lot of add constraint
> / drop constraint instructions.
Thanks for your reply Mike!
I probably didn't explain my steps very clearly, but what I was trying
to achieve was basically what you state above.
And if I run a test, changing my foreign key naming convention from:
"fk": "fk_%(table_name)s_%(column_0_name)s",
to
"fk": "fkk_%(table_name)s_%(column_0_name)s",
^^^
I get no changes in the autogenerate script at all.
And when I say changes, for constraints, I am indeed expecting drop/add,
as you explained.
Thanks,
- Chris
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy-alembic" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
