Michael Bayer wrote: > well the bug is probably on line l22, where its not correctly detecting > psycopg2: > > Or if you can figure out how to discern between pyscopg1 and 2 from the > module (if its got a version id or something), that would be better. >
Ok, I just checked in a change to look for pyscopg_module.__version__ which on my machine is currently 2.0b1. I don't have psycopg1 installed at all, so if someone can check it is still working on version 1, that would be great (there is no reason it should be broken, but it pays to check).
Robert PS My first check in using svk - works very well. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Sqlalchemy-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
