[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ps. mike, did you have any further thoughts > on the information_schema?
oh yeah, i forgot. Were we going to go with the information_schema package being able to give you an SQL-92 compliant gateway to the standard information_schema tables, but only if that database has them available ? or did we want to make it some kind of "across-all-dbs" style of thing ? the former is fine with me, but it wont be a very important package since information_schema is not well supported. in any case feel free to submit code on this one.... ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Sqlalchemy-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
