Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] Sessions

[dmiller]

On Feb 13, 2006, at 11:10 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:

dmiller wrote:

May I respectfully disagree...I don't think the session should be
managing scope. ...

fine with me.... ...so back to being simple is great.

Great!

and have foo()'s transaction pulled upwards to the outermost
transaction.  you need a begin/commit counter to do that.

Hmm. Is there a test for that? I don't think my patch is causing it
to fail.

no theres no test for that as of yet....

OK. I've added one (patch attached).

so to sum up:

...


tonight or tomorrow.


release, just so that the trunk can handle more changes coming down

people are starting to grumble about that.   I was hoping to release
already but this will have to be fixed up first.

so let me know if this works for you...hopefully I can get this change in I am going to try really hard, once this change is in place, to put out a without throwing off everyone already using the library in projects, since

Excellent! I'll be waiting anxiously.

~ Daniel

objectstore_test.patch
Description: Binary data