Valentino Volonghi aka Dialtone wrote: > Here I disagree. I integrated twisted and SQLalchemy in 50 lines or so. Ed > used quite a lot more space and the ending code, since longer is also more > complex. Being threading aware rather than threading based is the best > choice that SQLAlchemy developers had (IMHO).
to be honest I couldnt imagine how I'd write SA in a threading-based style ! I'll have to admit that since I am not very familiar with Twisted I cant have too much to offer this discussion until I study it carefully and learn all about these various models being discussed. Although my intuitive sense tells me that there should not be any changes needed to SQLAlchemy directly to support it....I am a much bigger fan, as some may have noticed, of external context control/awareness through devices like thread-local variables and similar ideas. An execution model so exotic that libraries used within it require fundamental changes in order to function would be suspect. - mike ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Sqlalchemy-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
