On 21.02.2006., at 20:13, Jonathan Ellis wrote:

Ah, that seems to be the source of your disagreement: Python's OO- ness isn't the anal "everything must be an object" kind popular in some other languages. It grows on you, though.

And if it doesn't, complaining about it to Python coders is about as useful as complaining about sigils to a Perl crowd. :)

I don't understan how from a sentence like (self citing):

> Initially I was a little doubtful about the choice of module level functions > as opposed to a more pure OOP style however I must admit that style considerations are secondary when things are done right.

you end up saying that I'm complaining about Python coders. I was not complaining about any code inside sqlalchemy.
Quite the opposite.

Obviously my personal judgement of this framework is based on how it fits to my personal coding because is not an application but a framework I have to work with. And from this stand point I was underlining that even if it doesn't follow a particular oo coding convertion (which in reallity does because for the most part is coded quite agressively using OO techinques, aside of glue commodity code like the mapper stuff) it highly modular and extensible and the solution of ProxyEngines is the demonstration that the framework was done right.

I'm not used to say "huh great stuff guys!", I like more trying to express what I like about this piece of software, maybe it could turn out to be a more interessant discussion.

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Sqlalchemy-users mailing list
Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users

Reply via email to