yah I am looking for 2.3 compatiblity in core modules. if you have a
special-use extension, its not as crucial. but if you specify
decorators etc., its good to also work out how that decorator can be
applied in a 2.3 style.
On Mar 13, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Luís Bruno wrote:
Jonathan Ellis wrote:
Should patches avoid use of decorators, generator expressions, and
other 2.4-specific code?
Yeah, I believe I've seen that on the list; can't point you to it,
though: my search-juju isn't working too.
I know no one asked my opinion, but I'd submit 2.3 code. Titus
Brown's post about python2.3 being standard in Mac OS X convinced me.
--lbruno
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the
live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding
territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?
cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Sqlalchemy-users mailing list
Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Sqlalchemy-users mailing list
Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
