Alan Franzoni wrote: > This seems related to the try-except block raising the custom exception, > which seems to be present in engine.SQLEngine._execute() method, but not > in > the _executemany method nor in the PGSQLEngine._executemany() method. Is > this intentional? I think it's not really useful, because I need to handle > *two* different exceptions *differently* at the very same point in the > code. If it's not possibile to wrap an exception every time it occurs, it > would be better to have it not wrapped at all. >
oh no, thats a bug....feel free to submit a ticket / patch for it, the exception wrapping should occur at all levels of execute. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Sqlalchemy-users mailing list Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
