all that other stuff is associated with a Schema as well. currently its just through the Table objects, but the original idea I had for this (i.e. last year) was that the Schema would really be a directory for all that stuff. so it will probably become that kind of thing eventually.
it all seemed like overkill at the time. what a lesson ive learned against the KISS principle ! Robert Leftwich wrote: > TableSchema? > > Slightly more explicit, but then a Schema normally has other 'things' > associated > with it (views, indexes, constraints, etc) so calling it something > (slightly) > different doesn't bring all that baggage with it. > > Robert > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting > language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live > webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding > territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Sqlalchemy-users mailing list > Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Sqlalchemy-users mailing list Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
