Florian is right. its a strict 3nf and a giant data model that is as
highly relational as it is gigantic. I tried to split it out into 4
sep. databases, but needed to join too much of the data to do it any
other way than fully integrated.
considering simple bulletin board apps that you can download as foss
apps are around ~30 tables, i don't think even 400 tables is too big
for something structured to be a serious enterprise application.
On May 6, 2006, at 3:57 PM, Florian Boesch wrote:
C'mon you can be nicer then that. Sure 234 tables is much, but not
that much for
a big data model and a strict 3rd normalform design. I mean, I
consider myself
running a fairly simple datamodel, and what I do is fairly gruft
free as it's
fresh, and it has easely accumulated 50 tables. 234 doesn't seem
like a stretch
for me at all.
Quoting Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
id ask why you have 234 tables in the first place.....
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Sqlalchemy-users mailing list
Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
