* Soni Bergraj [2006-05-06 17:03]: > Hello, > I'm considering to evaluate SQLAlchem and am puzzled if i should go with > 0.17 or pre0.2. How huge are the changes (advancements?)? How > stable(unstable?)is pre 0.2?
My impression is 0.1.7 is sort of a wrap-up of that line, and 0.2 is largely complete and maybe arriving in a couple/few weeks(?). If you're evaluating for longer term usage I'd think you'd definitely want to look at 0.2. Others here and Mike himself can probably give you more details if you need them, but I think that's a fair representation of the current state of things. Certainly I have no say in this though, it's Mike's call so don't bet the farm on my answer! -- ________________________________ toddgrimason*todd[ at ]slack.net ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Sqlalchemy-users mailing list Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
