Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] More DateTime woes

[Michael Bayer]

Ccing the person who contributed the psycopg1 patch for ticket #5.... Any reason why people might be stuck with psycopg1 ?  we are considering dropping support for it. On May 17, 2006, at 2:48 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: On 5/16/06, Rick Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Speaking of psycopg1, is there any good reason to continue support for that now that:   a) psycopg2 has been out of beta for some time? Federico has been pushing for people to upgrade.   b) SA requires Python 2.3, which has Std library datetime support I was under the impression that psycopg2 is backward-compatible with older libpg protocols and can work fine with older version of PG. So other than compat with the mx DateTime what's the psycopg1 use case? However, psycopg2 is _not_ a drop-in replacement for psycopg1; it's backwards-incompatible in significant ways. But I've been in favor of dropping psycopg1 for a while now. :)  Maybe the 0.2 branch is the place to do this. -- Jonathan Ellis http://spyced.blogspot.com