On 6/20/06, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> possible fix in revision 1644.  i think itll fix your immediate
> problem; not sure if its going to create others.

At first look it seems to fix it yes. I'll let you know if I bump into
something.

Thanks for your help!

Arnar


_______________________________________________
Sqlalchemy-users mailing list
Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users

Reply via email to