Charles Duffy wrote: > Given all the great support I've received here, I'm more than glad to > try my hand at a patch -- but not tonight; I'm 2.5hrs past my bedtime > already.
Great to hear! > Hmm. For per-relation settings, it looks extremely > straightforward: Add some new members to the relationship class, > and allow them to be assigned from the relevant constructors; > then, when all the relation objects are being instantiated in > process_relationships(), I just pass in the extra members; nothing to > it. You're right, this should actually work great. > I don't think I understand the impediment here -- it looks to me like > extra keyword arguments can be passed through to assign_mapper() > and will from there make it into the constructor for the mapper > itself. What am I missing? At some point I think I had troubles passing extra arguments through to assign_mapper(), but YMMV. Its been a long time since I tried this I expect it might actually work now ;) -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org _______________________________________________ Sqlalchemy-users mailing list Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
