as far API, it should be fairly stable;  I put the users through a  
very bumpy ride going from 0.1 to 0.2 so im pretty sure we wont have  
to do something like that again.

as far as performance and operational stability, i would place it in  
the nether-region of "production ready for the not-faint-of-heart".   
it is working quite nicely in a pretty widely accessed site http:// 
www.mydrawings.com, that has had a lot of Digg activity; we needed to  
fix an issue with the connection pool that is actually a quasi-bug in  
Python's Queue module (for which i still need to submit a bug report  
to them) and now its been running great.  thats pretty much the only  
issue Ive had reported so far of a production site being impacted by  
an issue; however, i dont think SA is in production use very much  
since its very new (first release was mid-february).

so since SA is undertaking a massive job (which, had i realized quite  
how massive, i dont think i would have started it....), i.e. to  
handle hundreds of different scenarios which are in fact pretty  
complicated, i am hesitant to bump it from "alpha" to "beta"...though  
it probably is "beta" at this point.  most of the bugs people find in  
SA occur when users try a configuration that trips over something  
that isnt quite right yet; but once their configuration works, then  
SA should be pretty consistent.

so id say at this point its just starting to ease into production  
scenarios.  probably OK for CMS-type applications; seems to be  
workable for group-interaction apps like mydrawings; probably still  
too risky for critical financial applications, derivatives trading  
platforms, etc.


On Jul 1, 2006, at 6:00 AM, Tzahi Fadida wrote:

> Hi,
> I am interested to know if SQLAlchemy is considered production ready,
> at least the ORM and the basic CRUD SQL queries areas and  
> transactions.
> (and the connection to PostgreSQL).
> Well, at least compared to SQLObject.
> Obviously SQLAlchemy is more powerful but sometimes you have to  
> sacrifice
> features for stability.
> 10x.
>
> -- 
> Regards,
>         Tzahi.
> --
> Tzahi Fadida
> Blog: http://tzahi.blogsite.org | Home Site: http://tzahi.webhop.info
> WARNING TO SPAMMERS:  see at
> http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html
>
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,  
> security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your  
> job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache  
> Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel? 
> cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Sqlalchemy-users mailing list
> Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users


Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Sqlalchemy-users mailing list
Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users

Reply via email to