well, OK, but if they support regexps, is the syntax of the
underlying regexp the same also ? else theres not much point in a
"generic" function for it.
On Jul 20, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Kevin Dangoor wrote:
> On 7/20/06, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> theres a generic operator function you can use via:
>>
>> table.c.column.op('~')('foo')
>
> I wonder if this should be formalized. I'm deploying on postgres but I
> want to test on sqlite, both of which support regular expressions,
> just with slightly difference syntax ("~" vs. "regexp"), and those are
> probably not the only two databases that support regexes.
>
> It looks like I may be able to override the behavior in the compiler,
> but I'm not sure that's the best thing to do.
>
> Kevin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Sqlalchemy-users mailing list
Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
